The US president insists his trade policy could generate billions in revenue
US President Donald Trump has suggested that revenue from his so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs could potentially replace the federal income tax.
This month, Trump announced “reciprocal” tariffs on nearly 90 countries, citing what he described as unfair trade practices. Following a sharp global market decline, he declared a 90-day pause on the duties, reducing them to a 10% baseline. China was one of the few exceptions, with tariffs on its goods raised even further.
Speaking to Fox News’ Rachel Campos-Duffy on Tuesday, Trump was asked whether his tariffs could eventually replace the income tax.
He praised the question, noting that the TV host was the only one who had ever posed it to him – despite frequently engaging with “top financial minds” who had never brought it up.
“There is a chance that the money from tariffs could be so great that it would replace – you know, in the old days, about 1870 to 1913, the tariffs were the only form of money,” Trump said, referring to the Gilded Age – a period of rapid industrial growth and rising national wealth, though marked by stark income inequality and widespread poverty.
“That’s when our nation was relatively the richest. We were the richest,” he added.
Trump, who has dubbed himself “a tariff man,” argues that his trade policies could raise over $1 trillion in the next year or so – helping to reduce the national debt and potentially offset or replace income taxes. He maintains that tariffs are strengthening the US economy, bringing “billions of dollars a day” into federal coffers.
Economists, however, are skeptical that tariffs could generate revenue on the scale Trump claims, warning that higher import prices could reduce consumer spending and dampen overall demand.
According to the Congressional Research Service, over the past 70 years, tariffs have accounted for no more than 2% of total federal revenue annually. In 2024, US tariff collections on imports represented just 1.7% of the more than $4.9 trillion in total federal revenue.
Financial analysts at ING said Tuesday that broad tariffs on trading partners – particularly China – may yield long-term benefits for the US economy and American workers. However, they cautioned that the transition could be “very challenging and likely economically damaging” in the short term.
If trade deals are reached and tariffs are scaled back, ING noted, the government could lose fiscal room for broader tax cuts.
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.news and ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of Steve Allen or the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve
Those behind the protests in the Balkan country are seeking to engineer a Maidan-style coup, according to Aleksandar Vulin Serbia is confronting the threat of a “color revolution,” Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandar Vulin has said. […]
The bloc’s foreign policy chief earlier warned candidate states against taking part in the May 9 victory celebrations in Moscow Russian State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin has condemned EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas’ threats […]
Russia has slammed the EU for warning candidate state against attending WWII celebrations on May 9 Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, said Tuesday that the EU’s attempts to pressure candidate states not to attend […]
Be the first to comment