Original Article by Raw Egg Nationalist
The “supposed” suicide of 61-year-old Peter Lynch in prison is another stain on the once-great name of Britain.
The list of reasons to be proud of being British grows shorter by the day.
It brings me no pleasure to say this. No pleasure at all.
At the weekend, further “personal dishonor and humiliation” was heaped upon shame for Brits when a 61-year-old grandfather took his life in prison, in Yorkshire.
But Peter Lynch didn’t really kill himself. He was murdered. Murdered by the British government, which has openly declared war against the British people. As in America.
The 61-year-old grandfather was sentenced to two years and eight months in prison for his part in the rioting that kicked off this summer after Axel Rudakubana, the 17-year-old son of Rwandan immigrants, walked into a children’s dance class in Southport and stabbed 11 people. Eight of them were children. Three little girls died. As you can imagine, people were very, very upset.
Initially, those who took part in the unrest believed the killer was a Muslim migrant. It certainly seemed plausible. European countries—France, Germany, Scandinavia—have been subject to a spate of knife attacks by migrants in recent years. Priests beheaded in church, children stabbed in play parks, right-wing politicians hacked at in town squares—that sort of thing.
It’s always the same people, shouting the same pithy slogans. Something about “Admiral Ackbar,” usually.
Posts claiming the Southport killer was a Muslim migrant were soon shown to be false, but the anger was not misdirected. Rudakubana was from a migrant background. Mass immigration has changed the nature of British society enormously, unrecognisably in some places, in the last three decades, and made British children far less safe than they once were. The British people know this. They also know that it wasn’t an accident. The policy of mass migration was intended, from the start, to change the country forever.
Lynch was one of hundreds eventually sent to prison for taking part in the rioting. He wasn’t really rioting at all. He was speaking out against the criminality. He stood outside a migrant hotel bearing a placard accusing police, members of Parliament and the media of being “corrupt.” He shouted at the assembled police that they were “protecting people who are killing our kids and raping them.” He called the migrants themselves rapists and killers.
Given the near total absence of vetting for most of the people—mainly young men—who cross the Channel in dinghies or jump in the back of lorries at Calais, at least some of the people Peter Lynch was shouting at probably were rapists or killers, or criminals at the very least. Some of them will no doubt go on to be if they haven’t already, perhaps emulating the Somali man who orally raped an unconscious British woman to death on a park bench.
And lets not forget that tens of thousands of white British girls have been groomed, raped, trafficked and even murdered by Asian Muslims who target them, in gangs, specifically because they’re white. The police and the establishment, from local social services to the Home Office itself, as well as the media were all totally complicit in allowing the abuse to take place and to continue taking place for decades.
If that isn’t corruption, what is?
Peter Lynch may have expressed himself in a manner that would rather ruin a dinner party, but he didn’t say anything much that wasn’t true.
Like many others, however, he pled guilty to the charges laid against him. The rioters were given terrible legal advice, by government-appointed counsel. They were told: plead guilty and things will be easier for you. A few resisted and pled not guilty, but the rest, demoralised and disoriented, accepted their fate, even those who were rolled up for doing things like standing and watching—I kid you not—or just shouting things that were true, like Peter Lynch.
It was the British government’s determination to send as many of the protesters to prison as they could, to make an example of them. The government empowered judges to deal with the protesters swiftly and harshly. Some courts sat 24 hours a day to get through all of the people arraigned before them. Most shockingly of all, the government actually cleared the jails of thousands of prisoners to make space for the newcomers. Nearly 3,000 criminals will have been released when the next batch of 1,000 is released on Tuesday.
That’s right: the government released convicted criminals to make way for people like Peter Lynch.
The British government is at war with the British people, like I said. And it has blood on its hands. The blood of Peter Lynch. Like the criminal cabal in D.C. in America has been with Americans.
Britain was once a nation famed throughout the world for its freedom. British freedom, and English freedom in particular, is the wellspring of the great American experiment in government of the people, by the people, for the people. But our nations have now diverged radically. Britain has become a byword for shabby authoritarianism. A dismal little island.
America has its political prisoners too. How could we forget the plight of the January 6th prisoners, imprisoned, tortured and, like Peter Lynch, killed by the government? But the American people still retain powerful tools not only to stake their claim to what remains of the rights that are theirs by birth, but to renew and revitalize them.
That’s why Elon Musk’s “freedom petition” matters. Pay no heed to the million-dollar prize he’s offering. Just listen to what the world’s wealthiest man is trying to say: The First and Second Amendments are all that stands between the people and tyranny. Once you’ve lost them, that’s it: you won’t get them back.
“The tree of liberty,” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” In Britain, the blood of patriots is definitely being shed, but our tree of liberty may already be dead at the roots. Learn from our mistakes and tend yours well—before it’s too late.
Be the first to comment