ICC ‘weaponized’ in Philippines political feud –…

President Marcos Jr. may have used The Hague-based court’s warrant to get rid of Rodrigo Duterte, Anna Malindog-Uy has told RT

The extradition of former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte to The Hague to stand trial for crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court (ICC) could be the result of a domestic political conflict, an expert has told RT.

Current President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. may have orchestrated the strategic move to get rid of a rival, according to Anna Malindog-Uy, vice president of the Asian Century Philippines Strategic Studies Institute.

Duterte, 79, was arrested at Manila’s international airport on an ICC warrant earlier this month and appeared before the court’s pre-trial chamber last week. He will remain in custody until his next appearance scheduled for September.

”There is this ongoing feud between the Marcos and the Dutertes and I think that the Marcos Jr. administration has weaponized the ICC against the Dutertes,” Malindog-Uy said.

Duterte is accused of crimes against humanity linked to a ‘war on drugs’ during his presidency. Official reports indicate that around 6,200 people were killed during police operations. Duterte assumed full responsibility for the killings but denies he led a campaign of systematic murder.

Read more

FILE PHOTO. Rodrigo Roa Duterte and Sebastian Duterte.
Duterte’s son vows to ‘fight back’ against father’s ICC arrest

The feud between Duterte and Marcos, representing the two most powerful political dynasties, was triggered by personal accusations and policy disagreements. Duterte accused Marcos of consolidating power and drug use, while Marcos dismissed the claims, referencing Duterte’s use of the painkiller fentanyl. Duterte’s daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, is facing impeachment over allegations that include a plot to kill the president.

Malindog-Uy also pointed out that the foundational concept of the ICC is that it serves as a court of last resort, intervening only when national jurisdictions are unwilling or unable to genuinely investigate and prosecute serious international crimes such as genocide or crimes against humanity.

”That is not the case with the Philippines,” she insisted.

Duterte’s supporters have condemned the arrest as unlawful, pointing out that the Philippines formally withdrew from the ICC in 2019.


READ MORE: Duterte arrest on ICC warrant a ‘kidnapping’ – former spokesman

The ICC claims it can retain jurisdiction over alleged crimes that may have taken place while a country was a signatory to the court.

The ICC has faced persistent criticism for its disproportionate focus on developing nations, with many accusing it of neo-colonialism and selective justice, serving Western interests rather than impartial law.

Views: 0
About Steve Allen 543 Articles
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.news and ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of Steve Allen or the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.